"I build close, long-term relationships with clients, acting as a trusted sounding board on their most sensitive issues and helping them navigate both the legal position and the wider strategic and reputational considerations."

"I bring clear judgement to complex matters, identifying the key pressure points early and aligning legal strategy with clients’ commercial objectives, particularly where reputational risks or sensitive personal dynamics are involved.

I treat my clients’ businesses as my own, investing time to understand how they operate and where the real risks lie so my advice reflects their commercial reality. I build close, long-term relationships with clients, acting as a trusted sounding board on their most sensitive issues and helping them navigate both the legal position and the wider strategic and reputational considerations.

I have significant cross-border experience, with a particular focus on the Middle East and CIS. I regularly advise on multi-jurisdictional disputes, investigations and enforcement matters, coordinating with local counsel and navigating different legal systems, regulatory frameworks and cultural dynamics."

Julius's recent work highlights:

The below matters were advised on by Julius at his previous firm. 

Advising a multinational technology company in relation to a high-profile public inquiry, including preparing senior executives for Parliamentary scrutiny and managing associated litigation and reputational risk. 

Representing an ultra-high-net-worth individual in an LCIA arbitration involving fraud claims worth over US$200m relating to the sale of shares in a joint venture company. 

Representing a former Executive Director of Royal Dutch Shell, in proceedings brought by the Milan Public Prosecutor and subsequent three-year trial in Italy concerning alleged bribery linked to the OPL245 oil deal, with the Federal Government of Nigeria pursuing civil claims of approximately US$1bn. 

Acting for shareholders in a cross-border dispute involving allegations of unlawful means conspiracy arising from a corporate restructuring, including jurisdictional challenges and coordination of parallel proceedings.